After years of stable energy prices, consumers and business are now faced with dramatically escalating costs with no sign of abatement. While government officials bemoan the high prices, allfrequencyjammer they are simultaneously preparing to take actions that are designed to add additional upward pressure. Due to concerns regarding man-made global warming, the U.S. is in the early stages of adopting a cap and trade system for CO2. The U.S. Senate recently debated a proposed bill but tabled the measure for the time being. President-elect Obama supports cap and trade legislation and is quoted as favoring the tightest limits anywhere. At this time, the European Union (EU) has just completed Phase 1 and is beginning Phase 2 of their version of cap and trade. Results to date on CO2 emissions, energy prices and GDP have been negligible. But, essentialwell Phase 2 is designed to be tighter and more impactful.
In this article we try to provide background on what cap and trade is and the experience to-date in the EU. At the conclusion of the article, newzhit we offer some points on what business can do to prepare and even thrive in this new environment.
To begin with, cap and trade is a process under which the government sets a limit – a cap – on the amount of CO2 that can be discharged into the atmosphere. This cap would then be allocated to emitters of CO2 through some mechanism, either by government direction, auction or a combination of the two, capcounter to specific industries (exactly which industries is an open question but electric utilities and other heavy manufacturing industries such as steel production are likely candidates). Businesses in these industries would then need to limit their CO2 emissions to the allocated cap amount. If they are able to emit less than their allocated amount, they would then be free to trade the excess allowance to other businesses that are emitting more. Each year the cap would be lowered to drive the desired behavior which is greater investment and utilization of so called green technologies. Overtime, the total CO2 emissions would in theory fall and the affects of human activity on the atmosphere and global warming would be mitigated.
Regardless of the theoretical impacts, our belief is that a practical real world impact will be an increase in cost. What is today free, the right to emit CO2 into the atmosphere, will tomorrow have a cost associated with it. For industries included in the cap and trade schema, electric utilities being a prime example, appoura this will be a direct production cost increase. For other industries, the cost increase will come in the form of higher energy prices and raw material costs as suppliers are forced to pass on their costs.
On the positive side of the ledger, businesses in the directly impacted industries that have already made investments in green technologies will be able to recover some of this investment by selling their excess allowances and will be able to be more price competitive in the marketplace. In addition, businesses that produce equipment or provide services associated with green technologies will find their markets and opportunities expanding.
Simply put, there will be winners and losers. But, more importantly, regardless of what business you are in, there will be an impact that needs to be prepared for.
Since the U.S. cap and trade scheme is still on the drawing boards, a look at what the EU has done is helpful. IN 1997, the Kyoto Protocol (Kyoto) created a framework and a set of rules for a global CO2 market. The nations of the EU are signatories to Kyoto and have established the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) The EU ETS is the largest multi-national, greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme in the world and is currently the world’s only mandatory CO2 trading program.
Within the EU, national allocation plans (NAPs) determine for each member state the cap on the total amount of CO2 that installations covered by the EU ETS can emit, and set out how many CO2 emission allowances each plant will receive.
The EC’s (European Commission) task is to scrutinize member states’ proposed NAPs against 12 allocation criteria listed in the emissions trading directive. The criteria seek, among other things, to ensure that plans are consistent with reaching the EU’s and member states’ Kyoto commitments, with actual verified emissions reported in the EC’s annual progress reports and with the technological potential to reduce emissions. Other criteria relate to non-discrimination issues, EU competition, state aid rules and technical aspects. The EC may accept a plan in part or in full. For more info please visit here:-buzzindeed.com
The EU just finished Phase 1 which began under Kyoto’s Voluntary Trials program which took affect on February 16, 2005. Phase 2 began in January 2008. Under Phase 1 it appears that the allocated CO2 emission allowances were higher than actual emissions. Carbon credits fell in price on the open market from a high of approximately $40/ton at the in early 2006 to less than $1/ton in late 2007. Lower allocations have been made under Phase 2.
To facilitate the market, the EU determined to accept Kyoto flexible mechanism certificates (Emissions Trading, The Clean Development Mechanism, and Joint Implementation) as compliance tools within the EU ETS.
Companies within the EU may trade or reassign their allowances the following ways
oprivately, moving allowances between operators within a company and across national borders
oover the counter, using a broker to privately match buyers and sellers
otrading on the spot market of one of Europe’s climate exchanges (the most liquid being the European Climate Exchange).
Like any other financial instrument, trading consists of matching buyers and sellers between members of the exchange and then settling by depositing an allowance in exchange for the agreed financial consideration. Much like a stock market, companies and private individuals can trade through brokers who are listed on the exchange.
When each change of ownership of an allowance is proposed, the national registry and the European Commission are informed in order for them to validate the transaction. In Phase 2, the UNFCCC will also validate any change that alters the distribution within each national allocation plan (NAP) in the EU.
With the creation of a market for mandatory trading of CO2 dioxide emissions within the Kyoto Protocol, the London financial marketplace has established itself as the center of the CO2 finance market, and is expected to have grown into a market valued at $60 billion in 2007.
In addition to procuring additional credits in the marketplace, companies may create new credits through the Clean Development Mechanism. In these situations, companies invest in green energy projects, including projects in other countries. Projects must meet strict guidelines in terms of both the carbon emissions reduced/avoided and the financial impact of the investment. Projects that would have been financial viable without the investment are not certified and do not generate the additional credits.